<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Méthods on Pierre Lévy</title><link>https://plevy.fr/en/tags/m%C3%A9thods/</link><description>Recent content in Méthods on Pierre Lévy</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><copyright>plevy.fr</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:30:52 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://plevy.fr/en/tags/m%C3%A9thods/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Between methods and practices in design - a learning moment</title><link>https://plevy.fr/en/events/entre-methodes-et-pratiques-en-design-un-moment-d_apprentissage/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:30:52 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://plevy.fr/en/events/entre-methodes-et-pratiques-en-design-un-moment-d_apprentissage/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="between-methods-and-practices-in-design---a-learning-moment"&gt;Between methods and practices in design - a learning moment&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pierre Lévy, professor at CNAM, Jean Prouvé Chair of Design&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Today I would like to focus on the place of methods and practices in design, and to describe their in-between as a place of practice development, that is, as a moment of reflexive learning about practice.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h3 id="1-design"&gt;1. Design&lt;/h3&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The first point of attention concerns the very notion of design and the way it is described by the design research community itself. A recent paper (Blackler et al., 2021) proposes an analysis of twenty years of discussion on one of the most active and renowned mailing lists in the world (PHD-DESIGN List, n.d.) concerning the definition of design. Its conclusion is as follows:&#10;&lt;em&gt;Despite a robust discourse around relevant perspectives on design, the list discussions are and have been repetitive, with no significant progress towards a consolidated definition of design. [&amp;hellip;] We propose that it may not be possible to define design in this way, and that the field should move away from reiteration and discuss the importance of the role of design&amp;hellip; (Blackler et al., 2021)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>